Men som uttryck för en ovilja att spela med i globaliseringen på Västs villkor, en strävan att hitta mänsklig värdighet i egna traditioner och inte bara i McWorlds Cocacolakultur, borde Jihad tas på allvar, som en utmaning till en radikalt annorlunda globalisering, en ny världsordning där knappa resurser fördelas rättvist till alla människor.Eller grön ungdoms ordförande(?) Elina Åberg om mujahedin. Det är tydligen inte bara i det räntefria samhället som miljöpartisterna verkar anse att den gröna färgen i partinamnet står för islamism.
Ditt och datt
1 timme sedan
6 kommentarer:
Förstår inte. Vad tyckte Elina om Mojje Hedin?
(Är Garthon-citatet påhittat eftersom du inte har någon länk? Annars är mp:are ofta lita bakom flötet, visst!)
Länken till Elinas klavertramp finns i rubriken.
Gahrtons citat finns bl.a. här och här, men eftersom det inte ligger direkt på någon av de sidorna valde jag att inte länka till det. Den ambitiöse läsaren torde dock inte ha några svårgheter att hitta det. Kommer ursprungligen från Aftonbladet.
Jag fick se det och blev stum. På kontinenten lär inte ämnet samhällskunskap finnas i skolorna, men hjälper samhällskunskap mot detta - eller är det själva felet?
Att dokuskådisar och halvkassa artister som är snygga gör karriär kan jag ta, men när denne, eller andra, "intellektuelle bimbos" -- som Elina väl är -- tar för sig i risksdagen för att stifta våra lagar, då ...då biter även jag mig lätt i underläppen (som man gör när man är bekymrad) och önskar att flera röstkreatur samhällskunskap kunde göra detsamma. Typ
(Magnus fredagsorerade)
International coalition against political islam (ICAPI)
www.icapi.org
ICAPI promotes the ideals and objectives of its member groups and assists them in achieving political influence.
Membership of the Coalition is open to Muslim groups and groups from a Muslim background opposed to political Islam, and that subscribe to the following Guiding Principles: Democracy; Human Rights; Separation of religion and state; Equality and freedom of the sexes; Freedom of expression and belief; and Non-violence.
Democracy
We define democracy as a system of government in which ultimate power is in the hands of the people, and in which every adult person is entitled to an equal say. This is seen as in opposition to dictatorship, where power resides in the hands of an un-elected person or group maintained in power by force, or theocracy – which we define as a system of government in which ultimate power in society rests with the representatives of God. According to these definitions, the government of Iran, for example, is a theocracy rather than a democracy, even though people vote for their members of parliament.
Human Rights
These are defined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948. We do not recognise attempts to redefine these rights as, for example, in the Universal Islamic Declaration of Human Rights, which are merely political attempts to limit human freedom. The priority is to attack the most outrageous Human Rights abuses before attacking the (equally real but relatively minor) injustices of the developed world.
Separation of Religion and State
We will promote separation of religion and state by exposing the chilling impact of political Islam wherever it has power. By drawing the distinction between Islam as a religion and political Islam we shall reach the masses most under threat from the latter.
As well as separation of religion and state – i.e. executive power – we must strive for separation of religion from the judiciary. Both politics and religion can influence the judiciary not only through the selection of judges but in the administration of justice. Some of the greatest injustices in the world today are being perpetrated in the name of God. Only democracy and true separation can bring justice to the people.
Equality and freedom of the sexes
In the part of the globe that interests us this remains extremely sensitive; women’s enemy number one is not, as we tend to believe, men, but those women who are not disposed to offer to future generations what they themselves have never had. The key to this is to teach women and girls about their worth as individuals and their right to dignity and autonomy.
This being the case, we cannot deny that we live in a man’s world that has always feared the empowerment of women. Religions made by men have never favoured the rights of women.
Freedom of expression and belief
Right now it is the religious who benefit from an absolute monopoly of this freedom - to the detriment of others in society. The state must become the guarantor of this freedom for all, believers and non-believers alike. Freedom of expression does have its limits; we may not exhort others to violence, for example. But we must have the right to openly criticize irrational beliefs, historical myths and the malign practices of religion. We must regain the ground now heavily occupied exclusively by the religious.
Non-violence
We reject violence in any form as a means to obtaining our objectives. We oppose all violence and inhuman punishment perpetrated in the name of religion or family honour.
Per Gahtron är redaktör för tidningen palestinia nu. Där framkommer hans syn på våld och terror tydligt.
Skicka en kommentar